← Back to episodes

Episode 178 ·

Do You Know Where Your Physicians Are? Underperformance Can Cause Financial Arrangements to Exceed Fair Market Value (FMV)

Send us Fan Mail If you’re paying your doctor for an hour of service, you better make sure your doctor is working an hour of service. In this episode, Captain Integrity Bob Wade breaks down what happens when financial arrangements exceed Fair Market Value (FMV). Hear why it’s important to keep tabs on your doctors, why monitoring is such a key component of compliance, what to do if financial arrangements exceed FMV, a case example of unethical billing practices, and the Top 10 PSA that inspired this episode. Learn more at CaptainIntegrity.com

  • Fair Market Value
  • Billing and Coding
  • Auditing and Monitoring

Listen to the episode

Audio

Ready to play. Audio loads only after you press Play.

0:000:00

Prefer Buzzsprout? Listen on Buzzsprout.

Companion article

Do You Know Where Your Physicians Are? Underperformance Can Cause Financial Arrangements to Exceed Fair Market Value (FMV)

Episode Date: July 23, 2025

In this episode of Stark Integrity, Bob Wade (Captain Integrity) explores a critical—and often overlooked—compliance risk:

Physician underperformance and how it can cause financial arrangements to exceed fair market value (FMV).

The episode centers on a simple but powerful concept:

If you’re paying a physician for an hour of work, you need to ensure that hour is actually being worked.

The Risk of Underperformance

A central theme of the episode is:

Underperformance can create significant compliance exposure.

If a physician:

  • Is compensated for services not fully performed
  • Does not meet contractual expectations
  • Delivers less time or effort than agreed

Then:

The arrangement may exceed fair market value (FMV).

The key point:

FMV is not just about what you agree to pay—it is about what is actually delivered.

Monitoring Is Essential

Bob Wade emphasizes that:

Monitoring physician activity is a core compliance function.

Organizations must:

  • Track time and effort
  • Validate that services are performed
  • Ensure alignment with contractual expectations

Because:

Assumptions about performance are not enough—verification is required.

The Link to FMV Compliance

Underperformance directly impacts:

Fair market value and Stark Law compliance.

Even if compensation is initially set at FMV:

  • Inadequate oversight
  • Reduced physician effort
  • Lack of monitoring

Can result in:

Payments that no longer meet FMV standards.

The takeaway:

FMV compliance is dynamic—it must be maintained over time.

Common Risk Scenarios

The episode highlights practical examples where issues can arise:

  • Physicians not meeting expected service hours
  • Compensation exceeding the value of services provided
  • Gaps between contract terms and actual performance
  • Lack of oversight over schedules and productivity

These issues often develop gradually:

Small performance gaps can quickly turn into meaningful compliance risks.

Documentation Matters

Accurate documentation is essential to demonstrate compliance.

Organizations must ensure:

  • Services are properly recorded
  • Time worked is clearly documented
  • Compensation aligns with documented work

Because:

Without documentation, there is no support for the arrangement.

A “Trust but Verify” Approach

A key principle emphasized in the episode is:

Trust—but verify.

While relationships with physicians are built on trust:

  • Verification ensures compliance
  • Monitoring protects the organization
  • Oversight aligns practice with policy

The takeaway:

Effective compliance requires both trust and validation.

Operationalizing Compliance

One of the most important insights is:

Compliance failures typically occur in execution—not design.

Even well-structured arrangements can become problematic if:

  • Monitoring is inadequate
  • Expectations are unclear
  • Operational controls are weak

Organizations should:

  • Implement consistent monitoring processes
  • Conduct periodic reviews
  • Align operations with contractual obligations

Because:

Execution is where compliance is proven—or lost.

Real-World Implications

Failure to address underperformance can lead to:

  • Stark Law violations
  • False Claims Act exposure
  • Repayment obligations
  • Increased regulatory scrutiny

The key point:

Operational lapses can quickly escalate into legal and financial consequences.

Practical Steps for Organizations

To mitigate risk, organizations should:

  • Monitor physician productivity regularly
  • Align compensation with actual services provided
  • Maintain detailed and accurate documentation
  • Conduct internal audits
  • Address discrepancies early

Because:

Proactive oversight is the most effective risk management strategy.

Key Takeaways

  • Underperformance can cause compensation to exceed FMV
  • Monitoring physician activity is essential
  • FMV compliance requires continuous validation
  • Documentation must support services performed
  • Operational execution drives compliance outcomes
  • A “trust but verify” approach is critical
  • Proactive monitoring helps prevent enforcement risk

Final Thoughts

This episode reinforces a simple but critical principle:

You must know where your physicians are—and what they are doing.

Compliance is not just about:

  • Structuring arrangements correctly

It is about:

Ensuring those arrangements are followed in practice.

Ultimately:

FMV depends on performance, not just agreements.

Because in today’s healthcare environment:

If performance is not monitored, compliance risk is not fully controlled.

Click here to listen to this Stark Integrity Podcast Episode:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/do-you-know-where-your-physicians-are-underperformance/id1588939373?i=1000718549068&l=fr-FR