← Back to episodes

Episode 95 ·

Hospital-Based Financial Arrangements: A Discussion with Joe Aguilar with HMS Valuation Partners

Send us Fan Mail There are a ton of considerations when it comes to hospital-based financial arrangements under the Stark Law. In this episode, Captain Integrity Bob Wade goes into the numbers and details with Joe Aguilar, Partner at HMS Valuation Partners. Hear why it’s important to include all aspects of revenue when determining Fair Market Value (FMV), why you need to understand the Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs), why you shouldn’t be afraid to start considering building the service line in house, why the devil is in the details, and Joe’s additional experience as a nurse practitioner. Learn more at CaptainIntegrity.com

  • Fair Market Value
  • Stark Law

Listen to the episode

Audio

Ready to play. Audio loads only after you press Play.

0:000:00

Prefer Buzzsprout? Listen on Buzzsprout.

Companion article

Hospital-Based Financial Arrangements: A Discussion with Joe Aguilar

Episode Date: November 1, 2023

In this episode of Stark Integrity, Bob Wade (“Captain Integrity”) is joined by Joe Aguilar of HMS Valuation Partners to explore the complexities of hospital-based financial arrangements under the Stark Law.

These arrangements—often involving specialties like anesthesia, radiology, and emergency medicine—are among the most operationally and financially complex in healthcare, requiring careful attention to Fair Market Value (FMV), structure, and documentation.

A Holistic Approach to Fair Market Value

A central takeaway from the discussion is that FMV cannot be evaluated in isolation.

As Wade and Aguilar emphasize:

  • Organizations must consider all aspects of revenue and economics tied to a service line
  • Compensation analysis should reflect the full financial picture—not just a single metric

This holistic approach is critical because FMV under the Stark Law must be based on the value of the services themselves—not downstream referrals or incomplete data.

The Importance of Full Revenue Consideration

A particularly important insight is the need to include:

  • All relevant revenue streams associated with the service
  • Both professional and facility components where appropriate

Failing to capture the full picture can lead to:

  • Misaligned compensation
  • Inaccurate FMV conclusions
  • Increased compliance risk

As highlighted in the episode, partial analysis often leads to faulty valuation conclusions.

Understanding Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs)

Another key concept is the role of Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) in structuring hospital-based arrangements.

FTEs impact:

  • How services are measured
  • How compensation is allocated
  • Whether arrangements are commercially reasonable

A clear understanding of FTEs is essential to ensure:

  • Alignment between work performed and compensation paid
  • Defensibility of the arrangement under FMV standards

Service Line Strategy: In-House vs. Outsourced

The discussion also touches on an important strategic consideration:

Should hospitals build certain service lines in-house?

Wade and Aguilar suggest that organizations should:

  • Be open to evaluating in-house models
  • Carefully assess cost, revenue, and compliance implications

This decision is not purely operational—it directly impacts:

  • Compensation structures
  • FMV analysis
  • Long-term compliance risk

The Compliance Risk: Downstream Revenue

A recurring theme—reinforced across enforcement trends—is the danger of allowing downstream revenue to influence compensation.

Regulators consistently focus on whether:

  • Compensation exceeds FMV
  • Payments are tied—directly or indirectly—to referrals

Recent enforcement actions show that when compensation is structured around capturing referrals rather than paying for services, liability risk increases significantly.

“The Devil Is in the Details”

As Bob Wade underscores in this episode:

Hospital-based arrangements are detail-driven.

Common risk areas include:

  • Misaligned compensation formulas
  • Incomplete revenue analysis
  • Poor documentation of services and time
  • Failure to align operations with contract terms

Because the Stark Law is a strict liability statute, even small technical gaps can create exposure.

Practical Takeaways

This episode highlights several critical principles:

  • FMV analysis must be comprehensive and data-driven
  • All relevant revenue components should be considered
  • FTEs must align with actual services performed
  • Compensation cannot be influenced by referral value
  • Strong documentation and operational alignment are essential

Final Thoughts

Hospital-based financial arrangements sit at the intersection of:

  • Finance
  • Operations
  • Regulation

As this discussion makes clear, getting them right requires more than contract drafting—it requires deep understanding of how the numbers actually work.

Ultimately, the takeaway is simple:

If the analysis is incomplete, the compliance risk is real.

Click here to listen to this Stark Integrity Podcast Episode:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/hospital-based-financial-arrangements-a-discussion/id1588939373?i=1000633306237&l=fr-FR